Opinion

How do we fix the UK’s poor mental health and wellbeing challenge?

By on

If you discovered your country was losing up to £78 billion a year, you would want to do something about it, right? Well, that is how much the UK loses to workplace sickness and ill health each year.


To put it in perspective, it’s nearly what we spend on all state schools in England, nearly what the Chancellor raises in corporation tax each year, and it could pay for all nurses in England for at least the next five years.

When the bill for HS2 was spiralling, the Government decided to reallocate the money elsewhere in the transport system. You can’t reallocate the money lost to workplace sickness and ill health. It gets sucked from our small businesses, charities, public sector bodies and larger companies in lost capacity, lower productivity and delays.

What you can do is try and prevent it being lost in the first place. Like the £45 billion that poor mental health is estimated to cost the economy. Or the 32.5 million days lost each year to work-related ill health and non-fatal workplace injuries.

But, how? One way would be to put health, safety and wellbeing at the heart of UK Government strategy to grow our economy, increase productivity and enable people to thrive.

In fact, we think the issue is so important the UK deserves to have a specific Minister for Wellbeing, who would be in charge of a cross-government National Wellbeing Strategy. We’ve called for this in our Manifesto, which we’ve published ahead of the next General Election.

 Mike Robinson, chief executive, British Safety Council: "We think the issue is so important the UK deserves to have a specific Minister for Wellbeing."

I was interested to see Mel Stride, the Work and Pensions Secretary, speaking to the Daily Telegraph recently about Britain’s ‘mental health culture’. He suggested that too many “normal anxieties” are being treated by people in work as “some kind of serious mental health condition”, and that doctors are signing them off “as not fit to carry out any work whatsoever”.

While I do not think we should in any way trivialise or diminish people’s mental health, Mr Stride is right to make the distinction between everyday worries and a longer-term mental health condition. He’s also correct that GPs aren’t always the right people to be making spot decisions about whether someone is fit to work, especially given the time pressures.

He also makes a good point when he says, “as a culture, we seem to have forgotten that work is good for mental health”. Although, I would have liked him to have been more specific and said “good work” is good for mental health, as well as wider wellbeing.

Because we know that good work is the key to people feeling a sense of purpose and making connections with others, as well as boosting their own and others’ self-esteem, self-worth and self-confidence.

Had Mr Stride been able to point to the good work of his fellow Minister for Wellbeing, he would have been able to reference the positive impact the Government’s National Wellbeing Strategy was having on employers and staff up and down the country.

The support for small businesses, in particular, which lack an HR team to develop a wellbeing strategy. The incentive via a new skills tax credit for companies that invest in training staff and line managers. And the great innovations being supported by a new corporation tax offset for investment in AI and other new technologies which will benefit people’s health, safety and wellbeing.

Unfortunately, so far at least, all these great ideas remain in our Manifesto. So, Mr Stride was unable to point to them as ways the Government was helping to support people’s mental health and wellbeing, to prevent the economy and his department losing billions more in absence, sickness and ill health.

Perhaps we can encourage him, his fellow ministers and whoever becomes the next UK Government to take up our ideas, so we can stop haemorrhaging more money and start growing our economy for the sake of people’s good health, safety and wellbeing.

OPINION


Blue AI Figures iStock XH4D

The impact of AI on health and safety prosecutions and sentencing

By Laura White and Sasha Jackson, Pinsent Masons on 12 June 2024

From undertaking hazardous activities, to identifying and predicting risk, to continuous monitoring, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to bring about significant change in workplace health and safety, but not without associated implications for prosecution and sentencing.



Air Conditioning Unit iStock Kira Tan

Clean indoor air in public buildings: can this be achieved?

By Professor Lidia Morawska, Queensland University of Technology on 12 June 2024

Despite decades of effort by many experts and a large body of evidence about the scale of the problem, the topic of indoor air quality (IAQ) in public buildings has attracted little attention beyond readers of professional journals where papers on indoor air pollution and its impacts are published. The Covid-19 pandemic changed this.



Air Pollution Image iStock Oversnap

Improving air quality, now and in the future

By Matthew Clark, CIEH on 10 June 2024

As a member of the Healthy Air Coalition, CIEH has argued for the UK Government and devolved nations to adopt more ambitious air quality targets that meet WHO air quality guidelines, and implement a holistic regulatory framework that supports local authorities with the capacity to enforce air quality targets.