National Grid Metering’s gas engineers are empowered to stop work at any point on safety grounds, helping the company achieve a full year without a single lost-time injury.
Features
Putting safety in everyone’s hands
At National Grid Metering (NGM), maintaining the highest safety standards is an organisation-wide responsibility. And this approach has achieved impressive results. With its people empowered to change or halt work, if necessary to stay safe, they have contributed to a full year free from lost-time injuries.
In more precise figures, a total of 1,029,900 hours have been worked, equivalent to 528 full-time employees, without a lost-time injury. And this is largely down to the way NGM trusts its people to make the right decisions when faced with situations that could turn into incidents – even where it means delaying or stopping work.
In total 1,029,900 hours have been worked, equivalent to 528 full-time employees, without a lost-time injury. Photograph: National Grid Metering
They don’t need to seek permission, as they are trusted to do the right thing, while the rest of the business focuses on helping overcome the challenge. This is one of the key foundations of NGM’s safety culture.
Of course, these safety-related decisions affect NGM’s customers. No one wants their gas infrastructure project to be delayed, but the teams keep customers involved throughout, so they understand fully the reasons for any hold-ups. Also, because any decisions are made so quickly, the delays are as short as possible. Most importantly, any impact on the progress of projects is much smaller than the consequences of not taking timely action.
Making time for thorough planning
In one example, metering specialist Paul Kundi took the decision to postpone the start of a complex project at the factory of a major food manufacturer. The work involved installing a new main to feed three new gas services, and setting up three new metering modules for different gas feeds to the site.
The safety implications were considerable, and Paul felt that the initial project plan didn’t allow enough time for all precautions to be thoroughly explored and implemented. So he called a halt until a new plan was in place, which would bring no risk of cutting corners or rushing critical operations.
This new plan also enabled the service partner to adopt safer working methods – in particular, to use a vacuum excavator to dig the trench routes needed to install the new outlet pipework and sections of the new gas main.
The workforce are trusted to make the right decisions when faced with situations that could turn into incidents – even where it means delaying or stopping work. Photograph: National Grid Metering
This machine sucks the spoil from the ground using a high-powered vacuum pipe, rather than mechanical digging, and significantly reduces the risk of damaging existing underground plant, such as utility cables and pipework. With this high level of consideration given to precautionary safety planning, Paul’s team were able to begin this major project with confidence.
Ensuring a safe working environment
At the start of a critical maintenance project, metering specialist Mike Simpson stopped work on a site when he spotted materials that could potentially contain asbestos.
This was due to the poor condition of the meter kiosk he was about to work on, and he needed to find out quickly whether it was asbestos. He worked with the site owner to organise an asbestos survey, and then took the decision to isolate the meter from outside the kiosk to keep it safe.
Once the survey had identified the material as harmless, Mike was able to continue with the maintenance. Just this short pause in the work gave peace of mind to Mike, his team and the customer.
Putting safety in writing
Even inadequate safety documentation can be reason enough to postpone work. When Paul Kundi and technical delivery lead, David McRoy, noticed significant gaps in a project’s paperwork, they decided to delay the job rather than forcing the contractors to rush through new documents and risk making potentially dangerous mistakes.
Given more time, the paperwork was completed with all safety factors included, and the project could go ahead with the reassurance that all risks had been properly considered and minimised. This insistence also set a precedent for future projects: no NGM work goes ahead without the correct safety documents.
Phillip Roberts, SHE specialist at NGM, sums up the impact of the organisation’s approach to safety: “These examples, and many more, show how building a culture of trust and responsibility, which lets our people make safety decisions, is preventing injuries, saving time, and maybe even saving lives. At NGM, our people don’t have to ask ‘Can we change or delay this project?’ Instead, they ask, ‘How can we help?’”
Chris Cleveland is Safety, health, environment, assurance, risk and resilience manager at National Grid Metering
FEATURES

Changes to ISO management standards: start preparing now
By Dr Keith Whitehead, British Safety Council on 08 August 2025
The key ISO management standards setting out best practice frameworks for effectively managing occupational health and safety, environmental and quality risks and opportunities are undergoing major revision, so it’s essential businesses start planning now to meet the new requirements in order to maintain their certifications under the relevant standards.

Inclusive, compliant evacuation planning: why training and maintenance matter
By Evac+Chair on 07 August 2025
Those responsible for business premises should provide assistive equipment to ensure the safe and efficient evacuation of people with mobility impairments. However, it is crucial that this equipment is regularly maintained and that staff are thoroughly trained in its use – otherwise, confusion and potentially fatal delays can arise in an emergency.

A step head: how the right safety footwear reduces workplace slips, trips and falls
By Simon Ash, HAIX on 06 August 2025
Safety footwear can prevent slip, trip and fall injuries, but it’s essential to consider other factors that could positively or negatively affect wearer comfort, such as breathable materials, waterproof qualities and boot weight.