Everyone in the UK should feel embarrassed that the UN has formally warned Britain that its failure to strip combustible cladding from high-rise residential buildings may be a breach of international law.
Three years on from that terrible fire there are still 300 high-rise residential and public buildings which have similar aluminium composite cladding panels and are yet to be remediated.
The Grenfell Inquiry has heard evidence of how the refurbishment of Grenfell Tower was planned. This reminds us of precisely those questions, about ensuring responsibility for fire safety is properly allocated and discharged, that has led to plans a new Building Safety Regulator. The Bill has arrived in Parliament in draft form but it has all taken far too long.
Housing is a key human right, set out in the 1948 Declaration, in Article 3 – the right to live in safety – and in Article 25 – a right to housing. The UN’s special rapporteur on adequate housing has written to the government to express “serious concern about allegations of multiple violations of the human right to adequate housing, of which safety is a key component – contrary to international human rights law”.
It has been hard to prove who owns some blocks, difficult to make arrangements that do not bankrupt leaseholders facing huge bills to replace flammable cladding, and the interim costs such as fire-watching in the meantime. Residents in many flats live in fear of another funeral pyre, while freeholders and developers refuse to pay to fix the problems because legally they are not obliged to.
This has three consequences – the fear and mental distress of the fire risk, the worry about the cost, and the fact that many of these flats are now unmortgageable and unsellable. People are trapped in an impossible situation.
Workplace health and safety advisors have a simple role, to understand risks and then explain them so that sensible decisions can be made to manage those risks. Whether the cladding panels were or were not in breach of building control standards, it is clear from the Hackitt Review that the standards were at best confusing and unenforced.
The regulatory system failed every one of the people who died, and also those now caught up in this nightmare. When regulatory systems fail, it is Government’s responsibility to sort it out.
As a result of COVID-19, we are discovering that the Bank of England can continue to print money without a problem, and that construction activities are one of the better ways to kick-start the economy – arguably with longer term positive benefits than encouraging drinking.
So far the Government has spent less than 25% of the money it allocated to deal with flammable cladding. Most public landlords have addressed the issue, but for private owners the picture is much bleaker.
The British Safety Council is in favour of both good safety standards and fairness – and on these grounds we are urging the government to identify cladding on high rise buildings as a suitable priority, to encourage more productive construction activity and help people trapped in unsafe homes.
By Mike Robinson on 14 June 2021
The public can play a practical role in supporting scientific understanding of problems like air pollution.
By Hugh Jones, the Carbon Trust on 14 June 2021
Climate change and environmental pressures are going to increasingly disrupt business as usual. However, as many businesses battle with the fallout from Covid-19 and Brexit, some may assume that corporate action on climate change may drop down the priority list.
By Neil Parish MP on 04 June 2021
Fresh air has never been so important as during the coronavirus pandemic. Even as lockdown restrictions ease, we know that meeting up outdoors – where possible – will reduce transmission of the virus.