Covid-19 is now a foreseeable risk: duty holders on notice

By on

The Covid-19 pandemic has put a spotlight on health and safety requirements the civil and criminal law imposes on duty holders. It has done so in the context of a virus no one had heard of 12 months ago and in respect of which scientific understanding is evolving.

It is more important than ever for duty holders to be alert to the practical realities of managing health and safety in the workplace to avoid exposing themselves to civil litigation or enforcement action by regulators, including, in the worst case, prosecution.

The Covid-19 pandemic may be unprecedented but the duty to comply with the common law and health and safety regulations is not. The reputational and financial consequences for failing to comply can be immense.

The common law and health and safety legislation in England and Wales apply across the board: all duty holders have a duty to ensure the health and safety of employees and non-employees affected by their undertaking, so far as reasonably practical.

Keith Morton: "The pandemic may be unprecedented but the duty to comply with the common law and health and safety regulations is not."

A failure to do so resulting in injury exposes duty holders to civil claims for damages. The criminal law does not require actual injury, the mere risk of harm is sufficient to establish a prima facie breach and, therefore, the possibility of enforcement action.

The law treats safety as a relative concept. Safety is judged according to the general and industry specific knowledge and standards of the time. This is assessed by reference to what might reasonably have been foreseen by a reasonable and prudent employer.

The risk of serious harm or death from Covid-19 is now a foreseeable risk to which we are all exposed in the course of work or using the services of others. All duty holders are now on notice of the risk and must act to manage it. The risk cannot (yet) be eliminated, but it can be reduced. Knowledge of how Covid-19 is transmitted and how to control it is evolving. Similarly, the law and guidance has and will continue to evolve.

Face coverings provide a good example: in March the guidance was that face coverings were of no benefit, now the law makes it a criminal offence not to wear them in settings such as public transport. Yet in other settings such as schools the circumstances in which face coverings should or must be worn varies between England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. In August, we were encouraged to Eat Out to Help Out. Now many cannot eat out at all, or in some cases, only with members of their household.

This may not inspire confidence in the rationale or effectiveness of the control measures. Nevertheless, two inter-related things are clear. First, duty holders must identify and implement reasonably practicable measures to reduce the risk of infection by reason of their undertaking. Second, authoritative guidance will continue to evolve, including industry specific guidance.

In truth there may be a tension between effective management of the risk of infection and effective management of the risk of litigation. Regulations must be complied with. But minimising the risk of litigation requires up to date knowledge and implementation of relevant guidance. Guidance is not law, but where risks and understanding of control measures are evolving duty holders are well advised to follow it or be able to justify why they have chosen not to if they are to protect themselves from litigation.

Keith Morton QC specialises in health and safety law at Temple Garden Chambers


Rhian Temporary Profile Photo

Safety incidents: preparation is key

By Rhian Greaves, DAC Beachcroft on 05 May 2022

The way a business responds to a health and safety accident and any resulting regulatory investigation is crucial both for its reputation and the eventual legal outcome.

4 DAY WEEK SIGN Istock Akshmiprasad S

Four-day week could boost employee mental wellbeing

By Grace Robinson, 4 Day Week Campaign on 19 April 2022

Thirty businesses have recently announced their participation in the UK’s biggest ever four-day week pilot, trialling a 32-hour, four-day working week with no loss in pay from June this year.

Royston Photo UK Parliament

The Building Safety Bill offers some financial relief for leaseholders

By Royston Smith MP, Southampton Itchen on 12 April 2022

The Building Safety Bill in its current form is an altogether better solution for leaseholders than we could have hoped for during the passage of the Fire Safety Act 2021.